Journal of Restorative Dentistry

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2015  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 49--53

Status of self-etch adhesives for bonding to pulp chamber dentin


Muhammet Kerim Ayar 
 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Muhammet Kerim Ayar
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon 61080
Turkey

Purpose: Present study investigated microtensile bond strengths (μTBS) of four one-step self-etch dental adhesive systems, two two-step self-etch adhesive systems and one three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system to pulp chamber dentin. Materials and Methods: The μTBS of seven current adhesives, including one three-step etch-and-rinse (Optibond FL, Kerr, USA), two two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray, Japan; AdheSE, Ivoclar, Liechtenstein) and four one-step self-etch adhesives (Clearfil S3 Bond, Kuraray, Japan; Optibond all-in-one, Kerr, USA; iBond, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany; L-POP, 3M ESPE, Germany) were determined. Adhesives were applied to pulp chamber dentin according to their respective manufacturer«SQ»s instructions, then μTBS tests were performed. Results: μTBS varied from 29.99 ± 7.82 to 38.15 ± 10.38 MPa. Highest μTBS mean was obtained with Optibond FL and lowest iBond, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany. There were no significant differences among all adhesives. Conclusion: Bonding effectiveness of one-step self-etch adhesive systems to pulp chamber dentin was comparable to two-step self-etch and three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.


How to cite this article:
Ayar MK. Status of self-etch adhesives for bonding to pulp chamber dentin.J Res Dent 2015;3:49-53


How to cite this URL:
Ayar MK. Status of self-etch adhesives for bonding to pulp chamber dentin. J Res Dent [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Dec 7 ];3:49-53
Available from: http://www.jresdent.org/article.asp?issn=2321-4619;year=2015;volume=3;issue=2;spage=49;epage=53;aulast=Ayar;type=0