Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Print this page Email this page Users Online: 284

    Article Cited by others


Formocresol, still a controversial material for pulpotomy: A critical literature review

Chandrashekhar Shashidhar, Shashidhar Jyothi

Year : 2014| Volume: 2| Issue : 3 | Page no: 114-124

   This article has been cited by
1 BiodentineTM versus formocresol pulpotomy technique in primary molars: a 12–month randomized controlled clinical trial
Omar Abd El Sadek El Meligy,Najlaa Mohamed Alamoudi,Sulaiman Mohamed Allazzam,Azza Abdel Mohsen El-Housseiny
BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19(1)
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Formocresol and Chloramphenicol, Tetracycline and Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Antibiotic Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: 24 month follow up
Jesús Luengo-Fereira,Sergio Ayala-Jiménez,Luz Elena Carlos-Medrano,Iovanna Toscano-García,Minerva Anaya-Álvarez
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2018;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars using MTA and Formocresol Compared to 3Mixtatin: A Novel Biomaterial
Zahra Jamali,Vajiheh Alavi,Ebrahim Najafpour,Naser Asl Aminabadi,Sajjad Shirazi
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2018;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]


Read this article