Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Print this page Email this page Users Online: 207


 
 Table of Contents  
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 54-55

Reminder about long-term clinical trials as a gold standard for the bonding effectiveness of adhesive resins


Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

Date of Web Publication8-May-2015

Correspondence Address:
Muhammet Kerim Ayar
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon-61080
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2321-4619.156648

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Clinical trials are considered as a gold standard for assessing bonding effectiveness of adhesive materials. However, clinical trials with long evaluation periods (5 years or more) are necessary to discriminate significant differences within the clinical performances of current improved adhesive materials. The present short communication discusses this issue and possible alternatives.

Keywords: Bonding, clinical trials, composite, dentin, durability


How to cite this article:
Ayar MK. Reminder about long-term clinical trials as a gold standard for the bonding effectiveness of adhesive resins. J Res Dent 2015;3:54-5

How to cite this URL:
Ayar MK. Reminder about long-term clinical trials as a gold standard for the bonding effectiveness of adhesive resins. J Res Dent [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jul 17];3:54-5. Available from: http://www.jresdent.org/text.asp?2015/3/2/54/156648

It appears that studies using shear bond strength have invaded the research areas of dentistry. A search for the terms 'dentin', 'bond', and 'strength' in the PubMed database found 3,720 papers published before 3 January 2015. Adding the term 'shear' to the search terms found 1,453 papers; thus, demonstrating the heavy usage of shear bond strength tests to evaluate the bonding effectiveness of adhesive dentistry materials and techniques. The aim of this letter is not to criticize shear bond strength test methodology; however, these findings reveal a time deficiency of clinical trials in dentistry is that one of important difficulties of conducting long-term clinical trials. However, shear bond strength tests provide easy and somewhat and/or arguably valid in vitro data.

It seems that clinical trials with very long evaluation periods (5 years or more) are necessary to discriminate between significant differences in the clinical performances of current, improved adhesive materials; materials from 10 to 20 years ago exhibited excellent performances in long-term clinical trials. [1] However, a period of 5 years exceeds the length of postgraduate education in most countries. This clearly limits productivity when conducting long-term clinical trials. However, the market lives of most adhesive materials are less than 5 years. Therefore, a question of who could conduct a clinical trial with a long evaluation period to assess the clinical performance of adhesive materials, which might not be on the market when the study is published, seems meaningful. A striking example of this issue is a silorane composite material with a specific adhesive system; this material is a breakthrough novel resin composite due to its unique chemical composition. This unique composite was introduced in 2007, and its manufacturer has announced that silorane will be removed from the market by 2015. After its introduction, only one mid-term (3-year) clinical trial was conducted. [2] This indicates that the dental research community failed to conduct a long-term clinical study of this breakthrough composite resin because of the low market lives of the materials whatever its novelty and time deficiency of clinical trials.

These facts demonstrate that clinical trials with long-term evaluation periods, which are the gold standard for assessing the bonding effectiveness of adhesive materials, might be a myth. The dental research community should consider this information about clinical trials. Research to improve in vitro artificial aging procedures, which mimic the aging mechanism that occurs within natural mediums, should be encouraged to overcome the time deficiency of clinical trials and obtain valid data regarding the bonding effectiveness of today's improved adhesive materials.

 
  References Top

1.
Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 2012;28:72-86.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater 2014;30:1089-103.  Back to cited text no. 2
    



This article has been cited by
1 Bond durability of contemporary adhesive systems to pulp chamber dentin
Muhammet Kerim Ayar
Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica. 2015; 1(2-4): 76
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1443    
    Printed102    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded254    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]