|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 107-113
Vertical root fractures: An update review
Anu Dhawan, Sumit Gupta, Rakesh Mittal
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sudha Rustagi Dental College, Faridabad, Haryana, India
|Date of Web Publication||29-Oct-2014|
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sudha Rustagi Dental College, Faridabad - 121 002, Haryana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Vertical root fractures are the most common cause of tooth loss. These fractures have a multifactorial etiology. They lead to advanced periodontal breakdown with deep periodontal pockets and vertical bone defects. Clinical signs and symptoms are often elusive in nature and may be difficult to detect. In this review, the etiology, diagnosis, prevention and management of vertical root fractures is discussed.
Keywords: Etiology, management, vertical root fractures
|How to cite this article:|
Dhawan A, Gupta S, Mittal R. Vertical root fractures: An update review
. J Res Dent 2014;2:107-13
| Introduction|| |
According to the American Association of Endodontists " A "true" vertical root fracture is defined as a complete or incomplete fracture initiated from the root at any level, usually directed buccolingually".  It starts from an internal dentinal crack, and develops over time, due to masticatory forces and occlusal loads.
Fractures or splits represent the third most common reason for tooth loss. However, the primary pathogenic cause is not always clear as it develops over a long period. Average time between root filling and the appearance of a vertical root fracture (VRF) has been estimated to be between 39 months  and 52.5 months  with a range of three days to 14 years.
| Incidence|| |
Gher et al. have reported a low incidence of 2.3%.  Highest incidence has been observed in endodontically treated teeth and in patients older than 40 years of age.  But, VRF can also be observed in vital teeth.
Teeth with flat or thin roots of smaller mesio-distal diameter and an oval diameter in a bucco-oral direction, such as those in maxillary and mandibular premolars; mesio-buccal roots of maxillary and mesial roots of mandibular molars; and mandibular incisors, are more susceptible to fracture. Testori et al.  reported premolars to have the highest incidence of VRF in endodontically treated teeth; however, Chan et al.  reported first molars to be the teeth most frequently fractured. On the other hand, canines had the lowest incidence. VRF is rare in vital anterior teeth, possibly because the direction of masticatory force is usually more lateral than vertical. Fracture most commonly occurs in bucco-lingual direction in individual roots of molar teeth. Mesio-distal fractures are less common. In anterior teeth, the fractures are most commonly in a bucco-lingual direction. 
VRF in vital teeth occurs more frequently in males due to factors such as stronger masticatory force, increased attrition, habitual chewing of hard food and less pliable supporting bone. 
An overall prevalence of 3% to 5% has been reported in retrospective studies. , However, the percentage of extracted teeth with VRF has been reported to be much higher - 10-20%. ,, Improved diagnostic knowledge on the subject has led to increased prevalence being reported in recent studies. Higher prevalence is noted in patients of middle and older age.
| Discussion|| |
VRFs have a multifactorial etiology that can be divided into predisposing and iatrogenic factors (summarized in [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]).
Predisposing factors for endodontically treated teeth
- Root anatomy- The unique anatomy of the susceptible roots, i.e. roots with narrow mesio-distal diameter, root curvature , and root depressions in mesial root of mandibular molars and the buccal root of bifurcated maxillary premolars,  predisposes these roots to fracture, especially at a later stage when additional tooth structure is removed during root canal and dowel preparations Canal and root shape combined with dentine thickness affect tensile stress distribution during intracanal procedures. Canal shape is the most important factor of the two since the area of reduced curvature radius is strongly influenced by stress concentrations 
- Loss of healthy tooth substance - Combined with tooth loss due to caries, the result of intraradicular procedures, the remaining tooth structure is directly related to the ability of endodontically treated tooth to resist fracture ,
- Moisture loss in pulpless teeth  was reported to make the endodontically treated teeth more brittle. However, it was not supported ,
- Change in architecture of an endodontically treated tooth makes the tooth more prone to fracture and require a restoration (full cuspal coverage) that will protect the tooth during function 
- Loss of bone support due to periodontal disease, pre-endodontic and prosthetic treatment can result in reduced ability of the tooth to withstand functional stresses 
- Pre-existing cracks
- Biochemical properties of root dentin- In a study on stress-strain response in human dentin, it was found that the dentin adaptation to functional stress-strain distribution results in greater mineralization in the bucco-lingual areas. This may increase the likelihood for a fracture to propagate in this direction, compared with less mineralization and more collagen in the mesio-distal areas. 
The iatrogenic cause of VRF is mainly attributable to different phases of root canal treatment:
- Excessive cutting during various phase of root canal treatment ,
- Increased stress generation with threaded and tapered posts ,
- Increased wedging forces with lateral compaction of gutta-percha accounts for 48%  to 84%  of cases of VRFs. The development of these stresses initiates crack introduction and propagation, leading to final root fracture. 
Fracture occurring directly during root canal treatment as a result of excessive force is rare as forces required for provocation of fractures vary according to the tooth type (approximately 10 to 12 kg), and are well above those that are clinically relevant (1 to 3 kg)  during root canal treatment. However, stress caused in dentin may initiate dentinal cracks, which can extend to complete fractures under functional load.
Non-endodontically treated teeth
In non-endodontically treated teeth, fractures might be related to special diet patterns or chewing habits,  excessive, repetitive and heavy masticatory stress  referred to as "fatigue root fractures." So the physical trauma is the most common cause for tooth/root fracture in vital teeth. Other predisposing factors are enumerated in [Figure 3].
As VRF progresses to the periodontal ligament, soft tissue growth into the fracture space increases the separation of the root segments. On communication with the oral cavity through the gingival sulcus, bacteria obtain access to the fracture area and an inflammatory process is induced in the adjacent periodontal tissue, resulting in periodontal ligament breakdown, alveolar bone loss and granulation tissue formation. 
Along the fracture line the periodontal ligament disintegrates, followed by bone loss, which is progressive especially in thin buccal bone plate.
Clinical signs and symptoms
The clinical signs and symptoms vary (according to the position of the fracture, tooth type, time elapsed since fracture, periodontal condition of the tooth and the architecture of the bone adjacent to the fracture) and are difficult to detect or reproduce during patient examination. The patient's symptoms may mimic many other possible diagnoses such as sinus problem, vague headaches or ear pain.
Pain and swelling
Local chronic inflammation due to infection leads to discomfort and soreness, mild to moderate pain, pain on biting, bad taste and swelling of soft tissues.  Some swelling of soft tissues is usually present. The swelling is usually broad-based, and mid-root in position compared to apical location in peri-apical abscess. Palpation will often show swelling and tenderness over the root itself.
A sinus tract is commonly found in VRF cases (13-42%)., In VRF, sinus tract is located close to the gingival margin as opposed to non-vital teeth where sinus tracts are located more apically (differential diagnosis from endodontic infections). The presence of two sinus tracts (at both buccal and lingual aspects) or multiple sinus tracts is almost pathognomonic for a VRF.
Deep, narrow, isolated periodontal pockets are commonly found in vertically fractured roots. Deep probing in one position around the circumference of tooth in presence of otherwise normal attachment usually indicates that the tooth is fractured (as opposed with periodontal disease, where the pocketing is generalized around a large part of the tooth). Deep probing in two positions on opposite sides of the infection is almost pathognomonic for the presence of a fracture.
Occasionally, sharp cracking sound during condensation of gutta percha ,, or during cementation of a post  may be felt by the patient. Bleeding or lack of resistance within the canal during condensation of a root filling material, repeated dislodgement of a well-fitting post  are also signs of VRF.
VRF poses a diagnostic challenge because
- Fracture line may not be visible as long as it has not extended to the cervical region. Early radiographic detection is also difficult
- Signs and symptoms are often similar to those found in failed root canal treatment or in periodontal disease.
Early and correct diagnosis is imperative, as bone resorption around a fractured root continues with time until the tooth/root is removed or lost.  Delay in diagnosis will result in limited success rate of any treatment modality due to loss of supporting bone and presence of a weakened periodontium. Diagnosis is based on: (summarized in [Figure 4]).
- History of facial trauma (for example, in patients with seizure disorders, stroke, heart attack or any other ailment that might have resulted in lack of consciousness) could result in a VRF if the trauma is directed accordingly
- History of pain, swelling, presence of sinus tract, mobility, or any history of post or restoration dislodgement. ,,
- A thorough clinical examination, including age and gender of patient; involved tooth, its location, pulp vitality; history of previous dental treatment (including endodontic and restorative treatments); and type of restoration (with or without post and crown) using glass ionomer cement, resin-based composite or amalgam.
Clinical diagnostic tests
Direct visual examination (with good illumination and magnification) of tooth especially the marginal ridges (areas most predisposed to crack) is important. When excess coronal structure is missing, or when a crown has dislodged, fracture may be directly viewed by examining the remaining tooth structure. Fracture is clearly visible when separation of fragments has occurred. A sharp probe may aid in identifying the fracture line where separation has not occurred.
Disclosing dyes stain the fracture line and aid the clinician to visualize a suspected crack. Also, cleaning the occlusal surface with a cotton pellet moistened with 70% isopropyl alcohol, washes away the food coloring on the surface, but the food coloring within the fracture line remains and becomes apparent.
Pulp vitality tests can be helpful in diagnosing a VRF (especially in ostensibly sound teeth) as fracture line may extend to the pulp causing inflammation and necrosis. Diagnostic information may be obtained when the patient complains of a sharp, sudden pain, especially while chewing. 
Rubber wheels, cottonwood sticks or aids such as Tooth Slooth may be used to reproduce the biting pain described by the patient.  This test is performed tooth-by-tooth or cusp-by-cusp. Usually the patient feels relaxed on biting and pain starts while releasing the pressure.
Fiberoptic light may be used to visualize a crack. Light is deflected at the crack, reducing its transmission through the tooth, making the fractured segment appear darker.
Periodontal probing test
Probing with periodontal probe or a no. 25 silver cone may reveal a narrow, isolated, periodontal defect in the gingival attachment.
Tracing the sinus tract
Gutta percha, endodontic explorer, etc., may be used to trace the sinus tract back to its origin.
- Fracture (radiolucent) Lines: Separation of root fragments makes fracture clearly visible. Proliferation of granulation tissue between the separated fragments often results in the rapid movement of the fragment away from the remaining root 
- Radiolucent Lines along the root fillings or post: Appearance of a vertical space adjacent to the root filling material (in an otherwise well-obturated canal) or a space between the edge of a root canal, which may be coated with cement, and the post itself may be indicative of VRF
Direct evidence of fracture line is often difficult to visualize. For the fracture to be seen the X-ray beam must pass almost directly down the fracture line. Even small changes in horizontal angulation (+4°) may render the fracture undetectable  Fracture line deviating from long axis of the canal may be radiographically more obvious, as compared to fracture line running parallel and adjacent to a root filling 
- Double images: When separation of fragments occurs in a direction other than parallel to the X-ray beam, overlapping of fragments may result in double images of the external root surface. But this effect is sometimes seen in normal teeth, for example, in the mesial concavity of maxillary premolar teeth.
- Extrusion of cement or filling: Extrusion of cement or root filling material may occur into the fracture site or apically When the fracture is present prior to filling, or occurs during the root filling procedure.,
- Dislodgement of retrograde filling material: May occur in fractured roots. ,,
Patterns of bone loss
The amount of bone loss is dependent on the nature and duration of the fracture.
- Widening of periodontal ligament space: Around the whole length of the root may indicate VRF. It is different from bone loss seen in a peri-apical lesion where bone loss occurs apically but without destruction of the lamina dura along the root surface
- Radiolucent halos: 'Halo-like' radiolucency running around whole of the root surface is a classic sign of VRF.  The radiolucent area may travel almost completely up the side of the root, resulting in a "J-type" lesion.
- Step-like bone defects: Obliquely oriented fractures often lead to a characteristic step-like bone defect which may mimic endodontic lesions resulting from causes like post perforations and vertical grooves
- Isolated horizontal bone loss in posterior teeth: Mesio-distally oriented vertical fractures can cause bilateral horizontal bone loss in an isolated tooth
- Unexplained bifurcation bone loss: Furcation bone loss may occur in molars with fracture, in absence of apical pathosis or overt periodontal disease and without any apparent reason (e.g. perforation)
- V-shaped diffuse bone loss: Diffuse V-shaped radiolucency (wider coronally, narrowing towards the apex) is a common radiographic image in vertically fractured buccal roots of maxillary molars or the roots of lower molars. Confined to a single root or a single tooth in the mouth, it is almost pathognomonic.
Lustig et al.  described the typical bone resorption patterns in teeth with VRF. In 90% of teeth with VRF extracted during exploratory surgery, buccal bone dehiscence along the entire root length was noted. In 10% of the maxillary premolars and mesial roots of mandibular molars, fenestration type of bone loss was noted.
The radiologic signs are highly non-specific and not detectable during early stages, in which there are subtle fissures with no separation.  These develop late as sequelae of chronic inflammation induced by the fracture. Only approximately one-third of fractures may be visualized directly at dental radiography.  Mesio-distally oriented fractures are not visualized directly on a typically exposed radiograph.
Computerized tomography (CT)
CT is superior to conventional radiography in the assessment of VRF  as the plane of axial sections is perpendicular to the fracture line. CT findings are characterized by a separation of the adjacent root segments visualized on at least two contiguous sections without continuation of the hypo-attenuated line into the adjacent tissue. However, high radiation dose, limited availability and increased costs limit its use in dentistry. 
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans provide high-contrast three-dimensional images at reduced dose and costs (alternative to CT scans in endodontics). 
Endodontic status after healing has occurred
Rapid deterioration of endodontic status of a tooth after a long time without symptoms, or reappearance of radiolucencies after healing has previously taken place, is indicative of fracture.
Laser in diagnosis
Kimura et al.  have suggested that root fracture could be diagnosed by DIAGNOdent with methylene blue (MB) dye solution. In a further study, they proposed that the use of detergent allows better penetration of dye thereby enhancing the detection of root fractures. 
An exploratory surgical procedure helps in definitive diagnosis, if VRF is strongly suspected from clinical and radiographic signs. Gentle soft tissue retraction may be sufficient to view the fracture line, and a dye material may also be used for better visualization of the fracture line. As a probe is passed over the fracture line, 'clicking' sound may be heard.  Reflection of a small full thickness flap may be required in some cases. There are cases where even flap surgery does not help.
Avoiding or correcting all the etiological factors provides the best prevention. This may include:
- Extensive cutting of dentin during preparation of the canal at curvatures weakens the root structure  and prone to fracture. So over-instrumentation should be avoided especially in the teeth and roots most susceptible to fracture, i.e. the maxillary and mandibular premolars  and the mesial roots of the mandibular molars 
- Over-preparation of the canal for a dowel, selection of an improper dowel and traumatic seating of intra-canal restorations may also cause VRF. An ill-fitting post may exert intra-radicular stresses leading to fracture. Use of either prefabricated, parallel-sided posts with round edges and passive insertion, or the fiber-reinforced resin based composite posts that have the same modulus of elasticity as dentin is recommended ,
- Nightguards may be used in patients with bruxism to minimize the risk of VRFs. Early reinforcement by castings with cusp coverage or by internal splinting with adhesive ceramic restorations should be done for teeth at risk.
In a multi-rooted tooth with VRF, resecting the root (root amputation or hemisection) can save the tooth. , However, in single rooted teeth with VRF, the prognosis is unfavorable. Extraction may be required (because of extensive bone loss and uncertain prognosis). However, many innovative attempts to treat and retain anterior teeth have been described in various case reports.
Extraction and replantation after bonding: Studies have reported successfully treating tooth with VRF by extracting the fractured tooth atraumatically, bonding the fragments, and then replanting the tooth either directly or with a 180 degree rotation (especially in case of anterior teeth).  It was advocated that the deep and narrow periodontal pockets along the fracture line may remain if teeth with VRF are replanted without rotation  as intentional rotational replantation avoids contact with the area where periodontal ligament was lost and area where the bone was lost in the treatment of VRF.  The rotation of the tooth was suggested to connect the remnants of the healthy periodontal membrane, remaining on the root, with the connective tissue in the periodontally involved socket wall.
Application of a bio-resorbable membrane to reinforce periodontal healing, by preventing any gingival connective tissue from making contact with the curetted root surfaces during healing and allowing for regeneration of periodontal ligament cells around the teeth has been suggested in few reports. , This membrane also prevents the ankylosis after replantation.
Other treatment options like use of composite resins  , Mineral Trioxide Aggregate  and silver glass ionomer cement  for bonding the fracture line have also been tried. Calcium hydroxide to promote tissue repair and resolve osseous defects before the roots were restored has also been used.  Poor long-term prognosis has been reported with teeth cemented extra-orally with cyanoacrylate. 
Other alternative attempts at treating VRF include:
- Bonding the fractured segments with glass ionomer bone cement and replanting the tooth in conjunction with an e-PTFE membrane 
- Two-stage surgical procedure of bonding with silver glass ionomer cement, placement of a bone graft material and GTR therapy 
- Combined technique of glass fiber-post and composite for aesthetic and functional results 
- Use of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin through the root canals to bond the fractured teeth 
- Use of dual-cured adhesive resin cement is preferred for bonding the fractured fragments, as it has a controlled polymerization and is easy to apply 
- Use of orthodontic elastics to join the buccal and palatal segments of fractured tooth followed by sealing with a photocured resin liner to allow the tooth to be endodontically treated and restored with a cast crown 
- Fitting of orthodontic bands before endodontic treatment to prevent propagation of a crack or fracture
- Use of CO 2 and Nd.YAG laser to fuse fractured tooth roots. 
| Conclusion|| |
Many of the treatment options reported involve extensive procedures often with poor outcomes. Where successful outcomes have been claimed, the long-term prognosis has yet to be proven. All case reports published so far that describe a treatment rationale do not include enough teeth to ascertain the efficacy of any procedure. Therefore, there is a need for further clinical research on the treatment of teeth that with VRF.
| References|| |
American Association of Endodontics. Endodontics: Colleagues for Excellence- Cracking the cracked tooth code: Detection and Treatment of Various Longitudinal Tooth Fractures. Chicago: American Association of Endodontics; summer 2008:1-8.
Meister F Jr, Lommel TJ, Gerstein H. Diagnosis and possible causes of vertical root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980;49:243-53.
Gher ME Jr, Dunlap RM, Anderson MH, Kuhl LV. Clnical survey of fractured teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:174-7.
Fuzz Z, Lusting J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth: Impact of operative procedures. J Endod 2001;27:46-8.
Testori T, Badino M, Castagnola M. Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: A clinical survey of 36 cases. J Endod 1993;19:87-91.
Chan CP, Lin CP, Tseng SC, Jeng JH. Vertical root fracture in endodontically versus nonendodontically treated teeth: A survey of 315 cases in Chinese patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endod 1999;87:504-7.
Holcomb JQ, Pitts DL, Nicholls JI. Further investigation of spreader loads required to cause vertical root fracture during lateral condensation. J Endod 1987;13:277-84.
Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjögren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10-5.
Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-44.
Fuss Z, Lustig J, Tamse A. Prevalence of vertical root fractures in extracted endoodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 1999;32:283-6.
Coppens CR, DeMoor RJ. Prevalence of vertical root fracture in extracted endodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 2003;36:926.
Yeh CJ. Fatigue root fracture: A spontaneous root fracture in non-endodontically treated teeth. Br Dent J 1997;182:261-6.
Leubke RG. Vertical crown-root fractures in posterior teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1984;28:883-94.
Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: Anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:458-67.
Bender IB, Freedland JB. Adult root fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:413-41.
Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Patterns of vertical fractures: Factors affecting stress distribution in the root canal. J Endod 2003;29:523-8.
Pilo R, Corcino G, Tamse A. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared by hand and rotatory instruments. J Endod 1998;24:401-5.
Heifer AR, Melnick S, Schilder H. Determination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34:661-7.
Lewinstein I, Grajower R. Root dentin hardness of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1981;7:421-4.
Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10:91-3.
Tidmarsh BG. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1976;2:374-6.
Reinhardt RA, Krejci RF, Pao YC, Stannard JG. Dentin stresses in posts-reconstructed with diminishing bone support. J Dent Res 1983;62:1002-8.
Kishen A, kumar GV, Chen NN. Stress-strain response in human dentine: Rethinking fracture predilection in post core restored teeth. Dent Traumatol 2004;20:90-100.
Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Load and strain during lateral condensation and vertical root fracture. J Endod 1999;25:99-104.
Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel and core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:558-67.
Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-7.
Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Collard EW, Pollack MH. Analysis of stress distribution by endodontic posts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:952-60.
Tamse A. Iatrogenic vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1988;4:190-6.
Letchirakam V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Finite element analysis and strain gauge studies of vertical root fracture. J Endod 2003;29:529-34.
Yang SF, Rivera EM, Walton RE. Vertical root fracture in nonendodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1995;21:337-9.
Walton RE, Michelich RJ, Smith GN. The histopathogenesis of vertical root fractures. J Endod 1984;10:48-56.
Moule AJ, Kahler B. Diagnosis and management of teeth with vertical root fractures. Aust Dent J 1999;44:75-87.
Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J, Kaplavi J. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertically fractured teeth. J Endod 1999;25:506-8.
Pitts DL, Natkin E. Diagnosis and treatment of vertical root fractures. J Endod 1983;9:338-46.
Lommel TJ, Meister F, Gerstein H, Davies EE, Tilk MA. Alveolar bone loss associated with vertical root fractures. Report of six cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;45:909-19.
Lustig JP, Tamse A, Fuss Z. Pattern of bone resorption in vertically fractured endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:224-7.
Cohen S, Blanco L, Berman L. Vertical root fractures: Clinical and radiographic diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:434-41.
Cohen S, Bums RC. Pathways of the pulp. 6 th
ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2002:2-24.
Meister F Jr, Lommel TJ, Gerstein H, Bell WA. An additional clinical observation in two cases of vertical root fracture. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981;52:91-6.
Rud J, Omnell KA. Root fractures due to corrosion. Diagnostic aspects. Scand J Dent Res 1970;78:397-403.
Färber PA, Green DB. The disappearing amalgam: Diagnosis of root fracture. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;35:673-5.
Alexander SA. Spontaneous expulsion of a retrograde filling. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;56:321-3.
Youssefzadeh S., Gahleitner A, Dorffner R, Bemhart T, Kainberger FM. Dental vertical root fractures: Value of CT in detection. Radiology 1999;210:545-9.
Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:106-14.
Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:413-7.
Kimura Y, Tanabe M, Yamazaki N, Amano Y, Kinoshita JI, Yamada Y, et al
. Basic study on diagnosis of root fracture by DIAGNOdent 1. Jap J Cons Dent 2009;52:12-20.
Kimura Y, Tanabe M, Amano Y, Kinoshita J, Yamada Y, Masuda Y. Basic study of use of laser on detection of vertical root fracture. J Dent 2009;37:909-12.
Zuckerman O, Katz A, Pilo R, Tamse A, Fuss Z. Residual dentin thickness in mesial roots of mandibular molars with light speed rotary instruments and Gates-Glidden reamers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:351-5.
Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
Kishen A. Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated teeth. Endodontic topics 2006;13:57-83.
Kurtzman GM, Silverstein LH, Shatz PC. Hemisection as an alternative treatment for vertically fractured mandibular molars. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006;27:126-9.
Kawai K, Masaka N. Vertical root fracture treated by bonding fragments and rotational replantation. Dent Traumatol 2002;18:42-5.
Masaka N. Long-tenn observation of fractured tooth roots preserved by adhesion. J Adhes Dent 1995;3:156-71.
Fariniuk LF, Ferreira EL, Soresini GC, Cavali AE, Baratto Filho F. Intentional replantation with 180 degrees rotation of a crown-root fracture: A case report. Dent Traumatol 2003;19:321-5.
Karring T, Lindhe J, Cortellini P. Regenerative periodontal therapy. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang N, editors. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, 4 th
ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2003. p. 650-704.
Trope M, Rosenberg ES. Multidisciplinary approach to the repair of vertically fractured teeth. J Endod 1992;18:460-3.
Hasegawa A, Bando H, Fukai K, Vongsurasit T, Tsuchida T. Periodontal surgical approach to the vertical fracture of the root. The application of composite resin to the fractured root surface. Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi 1988;30:1180-5.
Schwartz RS, Mauger M, Clement DJ, Walker WA 3 rd
. Mineral trioxide aggregate: A new material for endodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:967-75.
Seiden HS. Repair of incomplete vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth in vivo
trials. J Endod 1996;22:426-9.
Barkhordar RA. Treatment of vertical root fractures: A case report. Quintessence Int 1991;22:707-9.
Oliet S. Treating vertical root fractures. J Endod 1984;10:391-6.
Fidel SR, Sassone L, Alvares GR, Guimarães RP, Fidel RA. Use of glass fiber post and composite resin in restoration of a vertical fractured tooth. Dent Traumatol 2006;22:337-9.
Oztürk M, Unal GC. A successful treatment of vertical root fracture: A case report and 4 year follow-up. Dent Traumatol 2008;24:e56-60.
Takatsu T, Sano H, Burrow MF. Treatment and prognosis of a vertically fractured maxillary molar with widely separated segments: A case report. Quintessence Int 1995;26:479-84.
Arakawa S, Cobb CM, Rapley JW, Killoy WJ, Spencer P. Treatment of root fracture by C02 and ND: YAG lasers: An in vitro
study. J Endod 1996;22:662-7.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Diagnosis of root fractures using cone-beam computed tomography: difference of vertical and horizontal root fracture
| ||Fumi Mizuhashi,Ichiro Ogura,Yoshihiro Sugawara,Makoto Oohashi,Ryo Mizuhashi,Hisato Saegusa |
| ||Oral Radiology. 2020; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||In vivo and in vitro diagnosis of cracked teeth: A review
| ||AbdulrahmanN Alsolaihim,AljoodA Alsolaihim,LaylaO Alowais |
| ||Journal of International Oral Health. 2019; 11(6): 329 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Diagnosis and Managment of Maxillary Incisor with Vertical Root Fracture: A Clinical Report with Three-Year Follow-Up
| ||Ines Kallel,Eya Moussaoui,Fadwa Chtioui,Nabiha Douki |
| ||Case Reports in Dentistry. 2018; 2018: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Detection of simulated vertical root fractures; which is better multi-detector computed tomography or cone beam computed tomography?
| ||Mostafa S. Ashmawy,Ibrahim Yamany,Ashraf Abou-Khalaf,Mary M. Farid,Mohamed Rady |
| ||The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|